A4-5000 vs Phenom II X6 1100T BE

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
3.69
+345%
A4-5000
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.83

Phenom II X6 1100T BE outperforms A4-5000 by a whopping 345% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-5000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14932588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.745.14
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date7 December 2010 (13 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-5000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size346 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors904 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-5000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FT3
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-5000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-5000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-5000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8330
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-5000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-5000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-5000.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 3.69
+345%
A4-5000 0.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE 5745
+346%
A4-5000 1289

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.69 0.83
Recency 7 December 2010 23 May 2013
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

Phenom II X6 1100T BE has a 344.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

A4-5000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-5000 in performance tests.

Note that Phenom II X6 1100T BE is a desktop processor while A4-5000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1100T BE and A4-5000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
AMD A4-5000
A4-5000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 457 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1100T BE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 370 votes

Rate A4-5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1100T BE or A4-5000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.