Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 415 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.94 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.42 |
| Architecture codename | Thuban (2010) | ZEN+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 27 April 2010 (14 years ago) | 6 August 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $649 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 35 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 1.125 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 346 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 904 million | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Quad-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 93.867 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 April 2010 | 6 August 2018 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 12 |
| Threads | 6 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 180 Watt |
Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) has 44% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
