Ryzen 3 8440U vs Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen 3 8440U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 927 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | no data | 27.23 |
| Architecture codename | Thuban (2010) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023) |
| Release date | 27 April 2010 (14 years ago) | 6 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen 3 8440U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 346 mm2 | 137 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 904 million | 20,900 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen 3 8440U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen 3 8440U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen 3 8440U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen 3 8440U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 740M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen 3 8440U.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 14 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 April 2010 | 6 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 28 Watt |
Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) has 50% more physical cores.
Ryzen 3 8440U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 33.3% more threads, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 346.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen 3 8440U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 8440U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen 3 8440U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
