A6-4400M vs Phenom II X6 1045T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1045T
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.01
+214%
A6-4400M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.64

Phenom II X6 1045T outperforms A6-4400M by a whopping 214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1045T and A6-4400M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19162764
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.001.73
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date1 September 2010 (14 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$175no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1045T and A6-4400M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size346 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors904 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1045T and A6-4400M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1045T and A6-4400M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1045T and A6-4400M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1045T and A6-4400M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3unknown

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7520G (496 - 685 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1045T and A6-4400M.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1045T 2.01
+214%
A6-4400M 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1045T 3200
+217%
A6-4400M 1010

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 0.64
Recency 1 September 2010 15 May 2012
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Phenom II X6 1045T has a 214.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

A6-4400M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X6 1045T is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-4400M in performance tests.

Note that Phenom II X6 1045T is a desktop processor while A6-4400M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1045T and A6-4400M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1045T
Phenom II X6 1045T
AMD A6-4400M
A6-4400M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 176 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1045T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 187 votes

Rate A6-4400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1045T or A6-4400M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.