Celeron M U3600 vs Phenom II X4 X940 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 X940 BE and Celeron M U3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | Intel Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 18 December 2010 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 X940 BE and Celeron M U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 81+114 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 382+177 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 X940 BE and Celeron M U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | BGA1288 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 X940 BE and Celeron M U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HyperTransport 3.0, Enhanced Virus Protection, AMD64, SSE4A, unlocked multiplier | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
Phenom II X4 X940 BE and Celeron M U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 X940 BE and Celeron M U3600 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 X940 BE and Celeron M U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 18 Watt |
Phenom II X4 X940 BE has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron M U3600, on the other hand, has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 X940 BE and Celeron M U3600. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 X940 BE and Celeron M U3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
