Mobile Sempron 210U vs Phenom II X4 X920 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Mobile Sempron 210U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2164 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 3.06 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | no data |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 16 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Mobile Sempron 210U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 256 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Mobile Sempron 210U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | 812-ball BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Mobile Sempron 210U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HyperTransport 3.0, Enhanced Virus Protection, AMD64, SSE4A, unlocked multiplier | AMD64, SSE1-3, MMX |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Mobile Sempron 210U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 16 January 2009 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Phenom II X4 X920 BE has an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Sempron 210U, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Mobile Sempron 210U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 X920 BE and Mobile Sempron 210U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
