Mobile Sempron M100 vs Phenom II X4 P920
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 P920 and Mobile Sempron M100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2562 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 4x AMD Phenom II | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 3.22 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 P920 and Mobile Sempron M100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 P920 and Mobile Sempron M100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 (S1g4) | S |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 P920 and Mobile Sempron M100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0 | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX |
| VirusProtect | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 P920 and Mobile Sempron M100 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 P920 and Mobile Sempron M100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 10 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
Phenom II X4 P920 has an age advantage of 8 months, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Mobile Sempron M100, on the other hand, has a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 P920 and Mobile Sempron M100. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 P920 and Mobile Sempron M100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
