EPYC Embedded 3351 vs Phenom II X4 B97
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 B97 and EPYC Embedded 3351 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2086 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.36 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Series | no data | AMD EPYC Embedded |
Power efficiency | 1.59 | no data |
Architecture codename | Deneb (2009−2011) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 11 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $100 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 B97 and EPYC Embedded 3351 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 24 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
Multiplier | no data | 19 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 1152 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6 MB |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 258 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 758 million | 9600 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 B97 and EPYC Embedded 3351 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | AM3 | AMD BGA SP4r2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 B97 and EPYC Embedded 3351. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 B97 and EPYC Embedded 3351 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 B97 and EPYC Embedded 3351. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2666 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TiB |
Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 B97 and EPYC Embedded 3351.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 11 May 2010 | 21 February 2018 |
Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
Threads | 4 | 24 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3351 has an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 18.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 B97 and EPYC Embedded 3351. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 B97 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3351 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 B97 and EPYC Embedded 3351, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.