i7-2685QM vs Phenom II X4 975 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 975 BE and Core i7-2685QM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | Deneb (2009−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 975 BE and Core i7-2685QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 23 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | 1160 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 975 BE and Core i7-2685QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3 | Socket G2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 975 BE and Core i7-2685QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Phenom II X4 975 BE and Core i7-2685QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 975 BE and Core i7-2685QM are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 975 BE and Core i7-2685QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 975 BE and Core i7-2685QM.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 35 Watt |
i7-2685QM has 100% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 975 BE and Core i7-2685QM. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 975 BE is a desktop processor while Core i7-2685QM is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 975 BE and Core i7-2685QM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
