Athlon XP-M 2200+ vs Phenom II X4 960T BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon XP-M 2200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Architecture codename | Zosma (2010−2011) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | 1 June 2010 (14 years ago) | 19 July 2004 (20 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $97 |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon XP-M 2200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.67 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 12.5 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 346 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 904 million | 54 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon XP-M 2200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon XP-M 2200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon XP-M 2200+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon XP-M 2200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon XP-M 2200+.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2010 | 19 July 2004 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 27 Watt |
Phenom II X4 960T BE has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP-M 2200+, on the other hand, has 251.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon XP-M 2200+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 960T BE is a desktop processor while Athlon XP-M 2200+ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon XP-M 2200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
