Athlon II X2 280 vs Phenom II X4 960T BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon II X2 280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2560 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.52 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.24 |
| Architecture codename | Zosma (2010−2011) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| Release date | 1 June 2010 (14 years ago) | 6 February 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon II X2 280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 346 mm2 | 117 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 904 million | 410 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon II X2 280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon II X2 280 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon II X2 280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2, DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon II X2 280.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2010 | 6 February 2013 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Phenom II X4 960T BE has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Athlon II X2 280, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 46.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon II X2 280. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 960T BE and Athlon II X2 280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
