E2-6110 vs Phenom II X4 955 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 955 BE and E2-6110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2694 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD E-Series |
Power efficiency | no data | 4.46 |
Architecture codename | Deneb (2009−2011) | Beema (2014) |
Release date | 23 April 2009 (15 years ago) | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 955 BE and E2-6110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2048 KB |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 258 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 758 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 955 BE and E2-6110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | AM3 | FT3b |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 955 BE and E2-6110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | FMA4 |
AVX | - | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
PowerGating | - | + |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 955 BE and E2-6110 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 955 BE and E2-6110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-1600 |
Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics |
Enduro | - | + |
Switchable graphics | - | + |
UVD | - | + |
VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X4 955 BE and E2-6110 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Phenom II X4 955 BE and E2-6110 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 955 BE and E2-6110.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 23 April 2009 | 29 April 2014 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 15 Watt |
E2-6110 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 955 BE and E2-6110. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 955 BE is a desktop processor while E2-6110 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 955 BE and E2-6110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.