EPYC 9554 vs Phenom II X4 955 (95W)
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and EPYC 9554 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 8 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.97 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 18.50 |
| Architecture codename | Deneb (2009−2011) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) | 10 November 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $9,087 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and EPYC 9554 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 31 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 64 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | 8x 72 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | 52,560 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and EPYC 9554 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | AM3 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 360 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and EPYC 9554. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and EPYC 9554 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and EPYC 9554. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and EPYC 9554.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 April 2009 | 10 November 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 64 |
| Threads | 4 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 360 Watt |
Phenom II X4 955 (95W) has 278.9% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9554, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and EPYC 9554. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X4 955 (95W) is a desktop processor while EPYC 9554 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and EPYC 9554, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
