VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 vs Phenom II X4 925

VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 925 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2178not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataVIA
Power efficiency1.42no data
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)CNQ (2011)
Release date11 May 2009 (15 years ago)17 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 925 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.46 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die size258 mm2132 mm2
Number of transistors758 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 925 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3BGA
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt27.5 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 925 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 925 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 925 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2009 17 May 2011
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 27 Watt

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 251.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 925 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Phenom II X4 925 is a desktop processor while VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 925 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 925
Phenom II X4 925
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 322 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 925 or VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.