Athlon 64 X2 5600+ vs Phenom II X4 920

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 920
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.36
+134%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.58

Phenom II X4 920 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5600+ by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 920 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22342809
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.49no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.030.61
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date8 January 2009 (15 years ago)December 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 920 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size258 mm2220 mm2
Number of transistors758 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 920 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3AM2
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt89 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 920 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 920 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 920 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 920 1.36
+134%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 0.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 920 2156
+137%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 911

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X4 920 350
+51.5%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 231

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X4 920 1097
+174%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 401

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 0.58
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 89 Watt

Phenom II X4 920 has a 134.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+, on the other hand, has 40.4% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X4 920 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 920 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 920
Phenom II X4 920
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Athlon 64 X2 5600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 44 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 115 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 920 or Athlon 64 X2 5600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.