A8-6500T vs Phenom II X4 920

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 920
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.41
+11.9%

Phenom II X4 920 outperforms A8-6500T by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 920 and A8-6500T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22302320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.49no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.032.55
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date8 January 2009 (15 years ago)16 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 920 and A8-6500T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size258 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors758 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 920 and A8-6500T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FM2
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 920 and A8-6500T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 920 and A8-6500T are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 920 and A8-6500T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon™ HD 8550D
Number of pipelinesno data256
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X4 920 and A8-6500T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom II X4 920 and A8-6500T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 920 and A8-6500T.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 920 1.41
+11.9%
A8-6500T 1.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 920 2156
+11.8%
A8-6500T 1929

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 1.26
Recency 8 January 2009 16 September 2013
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

Phenom II X4 920 has a 11.9% higher aggregate performance score.

A8-6500T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X4 920 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-6500T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 920 and A8-6500T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 920
Phenom II X4 920
AMD A8-6500T
A8-6500T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 44 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 8 votes

Rate A8-6500T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 920 or A8-6500T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.