A9-9425 vs Phenom II X4 905e

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 905e
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.27

A9-9425 outperforms Phenom II X4 905e by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 905e and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23142023
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Series4x Phenom II (Desktop)AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.7810.88
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date2 June 2009 (15 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$212no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 905e and A9-9425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size258 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors758 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 905e and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FT4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 905e and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions45 nm, 1.25MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 905e and A9-9425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 905e and A9-9425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 905e and A9-9425.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 905e 1.27
A9-9425 1.79
+40.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 905e 1936
+28%
A9-9425 1513

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X4 905e 341
+6.6%
A9-9425 320

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X4 905e 1150
+139%
A9-9425 482

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Phenom II X4 905e 2290
A9-9425 2686
+17.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Phenom II X4 905e 8241
+90%
A9-9425 4338

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Phenom II X4 905e 15.1
+71.1%
A9-9425 25.83

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Phenom II X4 905e 3
+98.7%
A9-9425 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Phenom II X4 905e 255
+104%
A9-9425 125

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Phenom II X4 905e 64
A9-9425 76
+18.8%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Phenom II X4 905e 0.76
A9-9425 0.9
+18.4%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Phenom II X4 905e 0.4
A9-9425 1
+138%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Phenom II X4 905e 17
+76.9%
A9-9425 10

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Phenom II X4 905e 88
+73.3%
A9-9425 51

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Phenom II X4 905e 2018
+126%
A9-9425 891

Geekbench 2

Phenom II X4 905e 5175
+14.5%
A9-9425 4518

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 1.79
Recency 2 June 2009 31 May 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Phenom II X4 905e has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A9-9425, on the other hand, has a 40.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The A9-9425 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 905e in performance tests.

Note that Phenom II X4 905e is a desktop processor while A9-9425 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 905e and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 905e
Phenom II X4 905e
AMD A9-9425
A9-9425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 28 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 905e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1522 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 905e or A9-9425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.