A6-8500P vs Phenom II X4 840T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 840T
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.47
+61.5%
A6-8500P
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.91

Phenom II X4 840T outperforms A6-8500P by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 840T and A6-8500P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21582523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.28no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Carrizo
Power efficiency1.465.72
Architecture codenameZosma (2010−2011)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date1 September 2010 (14 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 840T and A6-8500P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size346 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors904 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 840T and A6-8500P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3FP4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 840T and A6-8500P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 840T and A6-8500P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 840T and A6-8500P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3Not Listed
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X4 840T and A6-8500P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom II X4 840T and A6-8500P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 840T and A6-8500P.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 840T 1.47
+61.5%
A6-8500P 0.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 840T 2330
+61.2%
A6-8500P 1445

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.47 0.91
Recency 1 September 2010 3 June 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Phenom II X4 840T has a 61.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A6-8500P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X4 840T is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-8500P in performance tests.

Note that Phenom II X4 840T is a desktop processor while A6-8500P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 840T and A6-8500P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 840T
Phenom II X4 840T
AMD A6-8500P
A6-8500P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 37 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 840T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate A6-8500P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 840T or A6-8500P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.