FX-4170 vs Phenom II X4 840

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 840
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.52
FX-4170
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.91
+25.7%

FX-4170 outperforms Phenom II X4 840 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 840 and FX-4170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21311960
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.08no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.511.45
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)27 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 840 and FX-4170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache0 KB8192 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size169 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors300 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 840 and FX-4170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 840 and FX-4170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 840 and FX-4170 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 840 and FX-4170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 840 and FX-4170.

PCIe version2.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 840 1.52
FX-4170 1.91
+25.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 840 2414
FX-4170 3034
+25.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X4 840 332
FX-4170 464
+39.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X4 840 941
FX-4170 1201
+27.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.52 1.91
Recency 4 January 2011 27 February 2012
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

Phenom II X4 840 has 31.6% lower power consumption.

FX-4170, on the other hand, has a 25.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-4170 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 840 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 840 and FX-4170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 840
Phenom II X4 840
AMD FX-4170
FX-4170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 251 vote

Rate Phenom II X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 80 votes

Rate FX-4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 840 or FX-4170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.