i3-10100F vs Phenom II X4 820

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 820
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.31
Core i3-10100F
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.51
+321%

Core i3-10100F outperforms Phenom II X4 820 by a whopping 321% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 820 and Core i3-10100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22741161
Place by popularitynot in top-10020
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.1020.97
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.308.02
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)12 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$90$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-10100F has 899% better value for money than Phenom II X4 820.

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 820 and Core i3-10100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size258 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors758 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 820 and Core i3-10100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Core i3-10100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Phenom II X4 820 and Core i3-10100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Core i3-10100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Core i3-10100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 820 and Core i3-10100F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 820 1.31
i3-10100F 5.51
+321%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 820 2081
i3-10100F 8748
+320%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X4 820 314
i3-10100F 1449
+361%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X4 820 923
i3-10100F 4496
+387%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 5.51
Recency 1 September 2009 12 October 2020
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

i3-10100F has a 320.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-10100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 820 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 820 and Core i3-10100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 820
Phenom II X4 820
Intel Core i3-10100F
Core i3-10100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 58 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7656 votes

Rate Core i3-10100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 820 or Core i3-10100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.