Athlon II X4 631 vs Phenom II X4 810

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X4 810
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.24
Athlon II X4 631
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.34
+8.1%

Athlon II X4 631 outperforms Phenom II X4 810 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon II X4 631 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23142259
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.231.27
Architecture codenameDeneb (2009−2011)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date9 February 2009 (15 years ago)17 August 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$116no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon II X4 631 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size258 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors758 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon II X4 631 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FM1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt100 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon II X4 631 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon II X4 631. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon II X4 631.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X4 810 1.24
Athlon II X4 631 1.34
+8.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X4 810 1971
Athlon II X4 631 2122
+7.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom II X4 810 295
+6.1%
Athlon II X4 631 278

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom II X4 810 891
+2.9%
Athlon II X4 631 866

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 1.34
Recency 9 February 2009 17 August 2011
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 100 Watt

Phenom II X4 810 has 5.3% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X4 631, on the other hand, has a 8.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon II X4 631.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 810 and Athlon II X4 631, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 810
Phenom II X4 810
AMD Athlon II X4 631
Athlon II X4 631

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 65 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 107 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 631 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 810 or Athlon II X4 631, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.