Microsoft SQ1 vs Phenom II X3 P860
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X3 P860 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1484 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 3x AMD Phenom II | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.12 |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| Release date | 4 October 2010 (14 years ago) | 2 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X3 P860 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X3 P860 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 P860 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Virtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a) | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 P860 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 P860 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Qualcomm Adreno 685 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 October 2010 | 2 October 2019 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 8 |
| Threads | 3 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Phenom II X3 P860 has 11900% lower power consumption.
Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X3 P860 and Microsoft SQ1. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 P860 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
