Athlon Silver 3050e vs Phenom II X3 N850

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X3 N850
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 35 Watt
0.79
Athlon Silver 3050e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.85
+134%

Athlon Silver 3050e outperforms Phenom II X3 N850 by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X3 N850 and Athlon Silver 3050e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26151989
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series3x AMD Phenom IIAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency2.1429.18
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date4 October 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X3 N850 and Athlon Silver 3050e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads34
Base clock speedno data1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache384 KB192 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X3 N850 and Athlon Silver 3050e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1 (S1g4)FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 N850 and Athlon Silver 3050e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-VMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 N850 and Athlon Silver 3050e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 N850 and Athlon Silver 3050e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X3 N850 0.79
Athlon Silver 3050e 1.85
+134%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X3 N850 1253
Athlon Silver 3050e 2939
+135%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Phenom II X3 N850 1922
Athlon Silver 3050e 3339
+73.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Phenom II X3 N850 5169
Athlon Silver 3050e 6780
+31.2%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Phenom II X3 N850 23.4
Athlon Silver 3050e 18.99
+23.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 1.85
Recency 4 October 2010 1 June 2020
Physical cores 3 2
Threads 3 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Phenom II X3 N850 has 50% more physical cores.

Athlon Silver 3050e, on the other hand, has a 134.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 33.3% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Silver 3050e is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X3 N850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 N850 and Athlon Silver 3050e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X3 N850
Phenom II X3 N850
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e
Athlon Silver 3050e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 30 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 372 votes

Rate Athlon Silver 3050e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X3 N850 or Athlon Silver 3050e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.