Atom 330 vs Phenom II X3 720
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X3 720 and Atom 330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2463 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.16 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 0.99 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Heka (2009−2010) | Diamondville (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 2 April 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $75 | $43 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X3 720 and Atom 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 3 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 533.33 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 12 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | 51.9276 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | 94 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.9V-1.1625V |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X3 720 and Atom 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3 | PBGA437 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 8 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 720 and Atom 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Phenom II X3 720 and Atom 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 720 and Atom 330 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 720 and Atom 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X3 720 and Atom 330.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2010 | 2 April 2008 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 2 |
| Threads | 3 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 8 Watt |
Phenom II X3 720 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% more physical cores.
Atom 330, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads, and 1087.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X3 720 and Atom 330. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X3 720 is a desktop processor while Atom 330 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 720 and Atom 330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
