7 150UL vs Phenom II X3 715 BE
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X3 715 BE and Core 7 150UL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Heka (2009−2010) | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) |
| Release date | 1 October 2010 (14 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X3 715 BE and Core 7 150UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X3 715 BE and Core 7 150UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM2+ | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X3 715 BE and Core 7 150UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Phenom II X3 715 BE and Core 7 150UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 715 BE and Core 7 150UL are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 715 BE and Core 7 150UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown Dual-channel | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X3 715 BE and Core 7 150UL.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2010 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 10 |
| Threads | 3 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
7 150UL has an age advantage of 13 years, 233.3% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X3 715 BE and Core 7 150UL. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 715 BE and Core 7 150UL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
