Mobile Pentium 4 520 vs Phenom II X3 710
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X3 710 outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 520 by a whopping 553% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2476 | 3295 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.22 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Mobile Pentium 4 |
| Power efficiency | 0.98 | 0.16 |
| Architecture codename | Heka (2009−2010) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | 9 February 2009 (15 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $85 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 258 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 758 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 91 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.98 | 0.15 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 1 |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 91 Watt |
Phenom II X3 710 has a 553.3% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Pentium 4 520, on the other hand, has 4.4% lower power consumption.
The Phenom II X3 710 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Pentium 4 520 in performance tests.
Note that Phenom II X3 710 is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium 4 520 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X3 710 and Mobile Pentium 4 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
