Pentium 4 560 vs Phenom II X2 B53

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X2 B53
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 80 Watt
0.72
+243%
Pentium 4 560
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 88 Watt
0.21

Phenom II X2 B53 outperforms Pentium 4 560 by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X2 B53 and Pentium 4 560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27083213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataPentium 4
Power efficiency0.850.23
Architecture codenameCallisto (2009−2010)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X2 B53 and Pentium 4 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)16 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size258 mm2109 mm2
Number of transistors758 million125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X2 B53 and Pentium 4 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3775
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt88 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X2 B53 and Pentium 4 560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X2 B53 and Pentium 4 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X2 B53 and Pentium 4 560.

PCIe version2.0no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 0.21
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 88 Watt

Phenom II X2 B53 has a 242.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X2 B53 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 560 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X2 B53 and Pentium 4 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X2 B53
Phenom II X2 B53
Intel Pentium 4 560
Pentium 4 560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Phenom II X2 B53 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 17 votes

Rate Pentium 4 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X2 B53 or Pentium 4 560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.