Atom N2650 vs Pentium SU2700

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium SU2700 and Atom N2650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Atom
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date2 June 2009 (15 years ago)5 January 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium SU2700 and Atom N2650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium SU2700 and Atom N2650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA 956no data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt3,6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium SU2700 and Atom N2650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Pentium SU2700 and Atom N2650 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium SU2700 and Atom N2650 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium SU2700 and Atom N2650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2009 5 January 2012
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 3 Watt

Atom N2650 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium SU2700 and Atom N2650. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium SU2700 and Atom N2650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium SU2700
Pentium SU2700
Intel Atom N2650
Atom N2650

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Pentium SU2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 8 votes

Rate Atom N2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium SU2700 or Atom N2650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.