Xeon W-3275M vs Pentium N3710

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium N3710
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.91
Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
26.03
+2760%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Pentium N3710 by a whopping 2760% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium N3710 and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2540193
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.96
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency13.8311.58
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date1 April 2016 (8 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$7,453

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium N3710 and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads456
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.56 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeIDIDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data25
L1 cacheno data1.75 MB
L2 cache2 MB28 MB
L3 cache0 KB38.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N3710 and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3710 and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium N3710 and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3710 and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3710 and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size8 GB2 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 405no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3710 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium N3710 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3710 and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes464
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N3710 0.91
Xeon W-3275M 26.03
+2760%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium N3710 1390
Xeon W-3275M 39834
+2766%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 26.03
Recency 1 April 2016 3 June 2019
Physical cores 4 28
Threads 4 56
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 205 Watt

Pentium N3710 has 3316.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3275M, on the other hand, has a 2760.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3710 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium N3710 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3710 and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N3710
Pentium N3710
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 616 votes

Rate Pentium N3710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 63 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N3710 or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.