Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U vs Pentium N3530

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium N3530
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.75
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
7.94
+959%

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U outperforms Pentium N3530 by a whopping 959% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium N3530 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2665950
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency9.4650.09
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)7 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium N3530 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.16 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache224 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB3 MB
L3 cache2 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium N3530 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FP6
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N3530 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Pentium N3530 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N3530 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N3530 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency896 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N3530 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N3530 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium N3530 0.75
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 7.94
+959%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium N3530 1195
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 12616
+956%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium N3530 188
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 1313
+598%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium N3530 537
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 4594
+755%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium N3530 1313
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 5289
+303%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium N3530 4450
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 27559
+519%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Pentium N3530 2
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 13
+611%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Pentium N3530 131
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 1161
+790%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Pentium N3530 39
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 175
+349%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Pentium N3530 0.47
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 2.02
+330%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Pentium N3530 0.3
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 5.4
+1829%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Pentium N3530 1246
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 3795
+205%

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Pentium N3530 3291
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 22199
+575%

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Pentium N3530 993
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 4010
+304%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 7.94
Integrated graphics card 0.77 6.04
Recency 23 February 2014 7 May 2020
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium N3530 has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U, on the other hand, has a 958.7% higher aggregate performance score, 684.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N3530 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium N3530
Pentium N3530
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 186 votes

Rate Pentium N3530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 251 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium N3530 or Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.