Ryzen 9 7950X vs Pentium M 765

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 9 7950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated66
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesPentium Mno data
Power efficiencyno data21.96
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Raphael (Zen 4) (2022)
Release date20 October 2004 (20 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 9 7950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm
Die size87 mm2CCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors144 million13140 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.988-1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 9 7950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479AM5
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 9 7950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 9 7950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 9 7950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 9 7950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5-5200

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 9 7950X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium M 765 1834
Ryzen 9 7950X 8448
+361%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium M 765 864
Ryzen 9 7950X 21064
+2338%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 October 2004 27 September 2022
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 170 Watt

Pentium M 765 has 2328.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7950X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 9 7950X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium M 765 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 7950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 765 and Ryzen 9 7950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1602 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 765 or Ryzen 9 7950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.