EPYC 7773X vs Pentium M 765

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 765 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated22
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesPentium Mno data
Power efficiencyno data19.47
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Milan-X (2022)
Release date20 October 2004 (20 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 765 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads1128
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm
Die size87 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors144 million33,200 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.988-1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 765 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479SP3
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium M 765 and EPYC 7773X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-3200

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 765 and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 October 2004 22 March 2022
Physical cores 1 64
Threads 1 128
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 280 Watt

Pentium M 765 has 3900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 765 and EPYC 7773X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium M 765 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7773X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 765 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 765
Pentium M 765
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium M 765 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 765 or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.