Celeron M 570 vs Pentium M 765
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 570 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3254 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium M | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 1.00 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 20 October 2004 (20 years ago) | 30 April 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 570 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 87 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 144 million | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.988-1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 570 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 570. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 570 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 570 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 570. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 October 2004 | 30 April 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 30 Watt |
Pentium M 765 has 328.6% lower power consumption.
Celeron M 570, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium M 765 and Celeron M 570. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
