Atom x7-Z8700 vs Pentium M 765
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 765 and Atom x7-Z8700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2490 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium M | 7x Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Cherry Trail (2016) |
| Release date | October 2004 (19 years ago) | 2 March 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 765 and Atom x7-Z8700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 84 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 765 and Atom x7-Z8700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 479 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 765 and Atom x7-Z8700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 765 and Atom x7-Z8700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 765 and Atom x7-Z8700.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Pentium M 765 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by 65% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Atom x7-Z8700 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium M 765 and Atom x7-Z8700. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 765 and Atom x7-Z8700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
