Ultra 7 265KF vs Pentium M 760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 760
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.21
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.46
+17738%

Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms Pentium M 760 by a whopping 17738% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 760 and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking320882
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data99.21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesPentium Mno data
Power efficiency0.7328.21
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date19 January 2005 (19 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 760 and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speed2 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm3 nm
Die size87 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors144 million17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.26V-1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 760 and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketH-PBGA479,PPGA4781851
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 760 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 760 and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 760 and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 760 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 760 and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 37.46
Recency 19 January 2005 24 October 2024
Physical cores 1 20
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 90 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 125 Watt

Pentium M 760 has 363% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has a 17738.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 760 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium M 760 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 760 and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 760
Pentium M 760
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 15 votes

Rate Pentium M 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 36 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 760 or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.