Celeron M 380 vs Pentium M 760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 760
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.21
+23.5%
Celeron M 380
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.17

Pentium M 760 outperforms Celeron M 380 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 760 and Celeron M 380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32133285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MCeleron M
Power efficiency0.740.77
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date19 January 2005 (19 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 760 and Celeron M 380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache32 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.26V-1.356V1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 760 and Celeron M 380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketH-PBGA479,PPGA478PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 760 and Celeron M 380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bit32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Pentium M 760 and Celeron M 380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 760 and Celeron M 380 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 760 and Celeron M 380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium M 760 0.21
+23.5%
Celeron M 380 0.17

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium M 760 86
+29.1%
Celeron M 380 111

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.17
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 21 Watt

Pentium M 760 has a 23.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron M 380, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Pentium M 760 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 760 and Celeron M 380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 760
Pentium M 760
Intel Celeron M 380
Celeron M 380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 15 votes

Rate Pentium M 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 760 or Celeron M 380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.