3020e vs Pentium M 760

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium M 760
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.21
3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.53
+629%

3020e outperforms Pentium M 760 by a whopping 629% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 760 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32032123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium MAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency0.7424.13
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date19 January 2005 (19 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 760 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KB192 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.26V-1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 760 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketH-PBGA479,PPGA478FT5
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 760 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 760 and 3020e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 760 and 3020e are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 760 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium M 760 0.21
3020e 1.53
+629%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium M 760 86
3020e 29
+197%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 1.53
Recency 19 January 2005 4 August 2020
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 6 Watt

3020e has a 628.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 760 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 760 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 760
Pentium M 760
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 15 votes

Rate Pentium M 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 812 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 760 or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.