Celeron 2.8 GHz vs Pentium M 750

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 750 and Celeron 2.8 GHz processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPentium Mno data
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date19 January 2005 (19 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 750 and Celeron 2.8 GHz basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache32 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.26V-1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 750 and Celeron 2.8 GHz compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478, H-PBGA479no data
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt52.8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 750 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 750 and Celeron 2.8 GHz technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 750 and Celeron 2.8 GHz are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 750 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 52 Watt

Pentium M 750 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 92.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 750 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 750 and Celeron 2.8 GHz, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 750
Pentium M 750
Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz
Celeron 2.8 GHz

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 28 votes

Rate Pentium M 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 32 votes

Rate Celeron 2.8 GHz on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 750 or Celeron 2.8 GHz, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.