Apple M1 vs Pentium M 750
Aggregate performance score
Apple M1 outperforms Pentium M 750 by a whopping 2362% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 750 and M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3227 | 1206 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium M | Apple Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 0.74 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | no data |
| Release date | 19 January 2005 (19 years ago) | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 750 and M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.064 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | 2 MB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 87 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 144 million | 16000 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.26V-1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 750 and M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 750 and M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium M 750 and M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 750 and M1 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 750 and M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Apple M1 8-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 5.17 |
| Recency | 19 January 2005 | 10 November 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M1 has a 2361.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
The M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 750 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 750 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
