Ryzen 9 7945HX3D vs Pentium M 738
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 97 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium M | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 62.74 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 27 July 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 89 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,840 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-5200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Pentium M 738 has 450% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 738 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
