Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium M 735
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium M | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | May 2004 (20 years ago) | 1 September 2009 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus support | 400 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 84 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 479 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo SU7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo SU7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Pentium M 735 by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Pentium M 735 by 69% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 10 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SU7300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 110% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo SU7300. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 735 and Core 2 Duo SU7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
