EPYC 73F3 vs Pentium M 1.40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 1.40 and EPYC 73F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.52
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data11.45
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Milan (2021−2023)
Release dateMarch 2003 (21 year ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,521

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 1.40 and EPYC 73F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache16 KB1 MB
L2 cache1 MB8 MB
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm7 nm+
Die size100 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors77 million33,200 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 1.40 and EPYC 73F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket478SP3
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 1.40 and EPYC 73F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 1.40 and EPYC 73F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 1.40 and EPYC 73F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 1.40 and EPYC 73F3.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium M 1.40 225
EPYC 73F3 46103
+20390%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 240 Watt

Pentium M 1.40 has 900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 73F3, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 1.40 and EPYC 73F3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium M 1.40 is a notebook processor while EPYC 73F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 1.40 and EPYC 73F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 1.40
Pentium M 1.40
AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Pentium M 1.40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 1.40 or EPYC 73F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.