Atom C3958 vs Pentium J4205
Aggregate performance score
Atom C3958 outperforms Pentium J4205 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium J4205 and Atom C3958 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2048 | 1633 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.27 | 0.54 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Intel Pentium | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Goldmont (2016−2017) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 30 August 2016 (7 years ago) | 15 August 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | $449 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Atom C3958 has 100% better value for money than Pentium J4205.
Detailed specifications
Pentium J4205 and Atom C3958 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 896 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 83 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium J4205 and Atom C3958 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium J4205 and Atom C3958. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Pentium J4205 and Atom C3958 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium J4205 and Atom C3958 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium J4205 and Atom C3958. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium J4205 and Atom C3958.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Atom C3958 outperforms Pentium J4205 by 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Atom C3958 outperforms Pentium J4205 by 78% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.56 | 2.77 |
| Recency | 30 August 2016 | 15 August 2017 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 31 Watt |
Pentium J4205 has 210% lower power consumption.
Atom C3958, on the other hand, has a 77.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
The Atom C3958 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium J4205 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium J4205 is a desktop processor while Atom C3958 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium J4205 and Atom C3958, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
