Celeron 3865U vs Pentium J2900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium J2900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.79
Celeron 3865U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.83
+5.1%

Celeron 3865U outperforms Pentium J2900 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26162580
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Power efficiency7.485.24
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Kaby Lake-U (2017)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$94$107

Detailed specifications

Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.41 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache224 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data98.7 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1356,FPBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s34.134 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency896 MHz900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.212
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes410
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium J2900 0.79
Celeron 3865U 0.83
+5.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium J2900 1249
Celeron 3865U 1321
+5.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 0.83
Recency 1 November 2013 3 January 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium J2900 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 50% lower power consumption.

Celeron 3865U, on the other hand, has a 5.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium J2900 and Celeron 3865U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium J2900
Pentium J2900
Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 78 votes

Rate Pentium J2900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 116 votes

Rate Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium J2900 or Celeron 3865U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.