Mobile Pentium II 400 vs Pentium III 800

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium III 800 and Mobile Pentium II 400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Mobile Pentium II
Architecture codenameCoppermine T (2000)P6
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium III 800 and Mobile Pentium II 400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed0.8 GHz0.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Multiplierno data6
L1 cache8 KBno data
L2 cache256 KB256 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography180 nm250 nm, 180 nm
Die size80 mm2180 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors44 million27 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium III 800 and Mobile Pentium II 400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket370no data
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt13.1 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium III 800 and Mobile Pentium II 400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 180 nm 250 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 13 Watt

Pentium III 800 has a 38.9% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Pentium II 400, on the other hand, has 192.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium III 800 and Mobile Pentium II 400. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium III 800 is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium II 400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium III 800 and Mobile Pentium II 400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium III  800
Pentium III 800
Intel Mobile Pentium II 400
Mobile Pentium II 400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 63 votes

Rate Pentium III 800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Pentium II 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium III 800 or Mobile Pentium II 400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.