Apple M1 Pro 8-Core vs Pentium III 1400S

Primary details

Comparing Pentium III 1400S and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated711
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Architecture codenameTualatin (2000−2002)no data
Release dateJanuary 2002 (22 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium III 1400S and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cache8 KB2.3 MB
L2 cache512 KB28 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography130 nm5 nm
Die size80 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors44 million33700 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium III 1400S and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket370no data
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt2060 ‑ 3220 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium III 1400S 194
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 17191
+8761%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 2060 Watt

Pentium III 1400S has 6337.5% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium III 1400S and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium III 1400S is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium III 1400S and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium III 1400S
Pentium III 1400S
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
M1 Pro 8-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 26 votes

Rate Pentium III 1400S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 104 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro 8-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium III 1400S or Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.