Celeron G6900T vs Pentium Gold G6500T
Aggregate performance score
Celeron G6900T outperforms Pentium Gold G6500T by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1756 | 1740 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 6.60 | 6.81 |
Architecture codename | no data | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
Release date | 1 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | - |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | + |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | + |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | + |
Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Execution Units | no data | 16 |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | 4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.44 | 2.52 |
Integrated graphics card | 3.09 | 2.85 |
Recency | 1 April 2020 | 4 January 2022 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Pentium Gold G6500T has 8.4% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.
Celeron G6900T, on the other hand, has a 3.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Gold G6500T and Celeron G6900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.