Xeon E3120 vs Pentium G840

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G840
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.82

Xeon E3120 outperforms Pentium G840 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G840 and Xeon E3120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26062533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.61no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.151.29
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date22 May 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G840 and Xeon E3120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache3 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature69 °C72 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G840 and Xeon E3120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G840 and Xeon E3120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pentium G840 and Xeon E3120 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G840 and Xeon E3120 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G840 and Xeon E3120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G840 and Xeon E3120 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G840 and Xeon E3120.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G840 0.82
Xeon E3120 0.92
+12.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G840 1253
Xeon E3120 1408
+12.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.82 0.92
Recency 22 May 2011 1 July 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

Pentium G840 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E3120, on the other hand, has a 12.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The Xeon E3120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G840 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G840 is a desktop processor while Xeon E3120 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G840 and Xeon E3120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G840
Pentium G840
Intel Xeon E3120
Xeon E3120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 191 vote

Rate Pentium G840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 10 votes

Rate Xeon E3120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G840 or Xeon E3120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.