Xeon D-1813NT vs Pentium G6951

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G6951
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.87
Xeon D-1813NT
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 42 Watt
4.87
+460%

Xeon D-1813NT outperforms Pentium G6951 by a whopping 460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G6951 and Xeon D-1813NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25521237
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.12no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.1310.97
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)no data
Release date1 September 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$94no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G6951 and Xeon D-1813NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache3 MB (shared)10240 KB
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G6951 and Xeon D-1813NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt42 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G6951 and Xeon D-1813NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium G6951 and Xeon D-1813NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G6951 and Xeon D-1813NT are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G6951 and Xeon D-1813NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16.38 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G6951 and Xeon D-1813NT integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G6951 and Xeon D-1813NT.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1616
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G6951 0.87
Xeon D-1813NT 4.87
+460%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G6951 1383
Xeon D-1813NT 7732
+459%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 4.87
Recency 1 September 2010 1 October 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 42 Watt

Xeon D-1813NT has a 459.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 73.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon D-1813NT is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G6951 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium G6951 is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1813NT is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G6951 and Xeon D-1813NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G6951
Pentium G6951
Intel Xeon D-1813NT
Xeon D-1813NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Pentium G6951 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1813NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G6951 or Xeon D-1813NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.