Celeron D 352 vs Pentium G645

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G645 and Celeron D 352 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2531not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.31no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Cedar Mill (2006)
Release date2 September 2012 (12 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G645 and Celeron D 352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)16 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size131 mm2109 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C69 °C
Number of transistors504 million125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.25V-1.325V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G645 and Celeron D 352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt86 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G645 and Celeron D 352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pentium G645 and Celeron D 352 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G645 and Celeron D 352 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G645 and Celeron D 352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G645 and Celeron D 352 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G645 and Celeron D 352.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G645 1428
+421%
Celeron D 352 274

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 86 Watt

Pentium G645 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 32.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium G645 and Celeron D 352. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G645 and Celeron D 352, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G645
Pentium G645
Intel Celeron D 352
Celeron D 352

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 159 votes

Rate Pentium G645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 35 votes

Rate Celeron D 352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G645 or Celeron D 352, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.